Genealogy > Thom(p)son DNA Project

post your DNA

<< < (2/6) > >>

Cathy McTavish:
I hope this attaches, it is my brother's DNA analysis...............

Cathy


[attachment deleted by admin]

Cathy McTavish:
My goodness....it would appear that my dna sample is very similiar...................Booner, what is your user name on ancestry??
Cathy

Booner:
Cathy.

My Ancestory.com username is... dthompson1334.... and i just downloaded my FTM gedcom file, and think i called it "Thompson Family History"

going to look at the DNA now

Booner

Booner:
Hi Cathy,
I just did a comparison between your brother, and Tom & myself.  Below is a comparison between we three.. out of 46 markers, I match your brother in only 34, Tom matches your brother in 33: so its several generations back before your brother & I share a common ancestor,,,,, something in the range of 40 or 50 generations or more, just off by one sequence and it's 7 or 8 generations before you have a common ancestory--the DNA within the Y chromosome just doesn't mutate very often..... So I guess the Thomson-being MacTavish-thing would be true---if you go back 50 generations or so!!!!!   Lets see,  50 generations back would put us about the time the neolithic hunter-gatherers were settling Scotland, so yea, that's when we had a common ancestor.  Seriously, I think this is rather important. It proves the lie that Thompsons' are really MacTavishes...genetically, it's not possible.....

Below is my DNA,  Tom's difference to me is listed in ( ), Cathy's brother difference to me in { }

LOCATION: SEQUENCE        LOCATION: SEQUENCE     LOCATION: SEQUENCE
DYS 19a         14               DYS 444       12 {13}      DYS 464a   15
DYS 19b         --               DYS 445                         DYS 464b   16   {16}
DYS 385a       11               DYS 446        13              DYS 464c   17   {15}
DYS 385b       15   {14}      DYS 447        24 {24}      DYS 464d   18   {16}
DYS 388        12                DYS 448        19              DYS 464e   --
DYS 389I       13    {13}     DYS 449        29  ( 30)      DYS 464f    --
DYS 389II      29    {23}     DYS 452                         GAAT1807 
DYS 390        23   {23}      DYS 454        11              YCA IIa       19
DYS 391        10                DYS 455        11              YCA IIb       23
DYS 392        13                DYS 456        15   (16)     GATA A10    17  {14}

DYS 393        13                DYS 458        17              DYS 635      24
DYS 426        12                DYS 459a        9              GATA H4.I    22
DYS 437        15                DYS 459b       10
DYS 438        12                DYS 460         11
DYS 439        11                DYS 461         
DYS 441                           DYS 462         
DYS 442        18 (13*){17} DYS 463     


My best to everyone who posts on our site, and a big thanks to Cathy for posting here DNA

Booner

Mary:
Hey Booner!

Thank you so much for doing all the legwork on the 3 DNA lists.  Those things are enough to make your head spin! Yeah....looks like you all have great connections to MacT.....like, the most basic, common DNA of ALL HUMANS!   It was great to see that we are NOT related (outside of Adam?) and that, in fact, THOM(P)SONS ARE related. What, you ask? Well, we keep running into the surname naming conventions of "son of Tom" which I do agree with.....but it now shows that those "sons of Tom" ARE ACTUALLY RELATED! You don't just share a NAME, but are genetically related.  That's sooooooooooo cool!  8)

Thanks again - you're the man! (As if you didn't know! :)

Mary

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page