Genealogy > DNA Tests/Markers
Thompson Family Tree data:
Thomas Thompson:
Francis T, 13,23,14,10,11,15,12,12,11,13,13,29,17,9,10,11,11,24,15,19,30,15,16,17,18,11,11,19,23,16,14,18,17,36,36,13,12,11,9,15,16,8,10,10,8,10,10,12,23,23,16,10,
Thomas T 13,23,14,10,11,15,12,12,11,13,13,29,17,9,10,11,11,24,15,19,29,15,16,17,18,11,11,19,23,15,14,19,17,36,37,13,12,11,9,15,16,8,10,10,8,10,10,12,23,23,16,10,
James Ste.13,23,14,10,11,15,12,12,11,13,13,29,17,9,10,11,11,24,15,19,29,15,16,17,18,11,11,19,23,15,14,19,17,36,37,13,12,11,9,15,16,8,10,10,8,10,10,12,23,23,16,10,
Jerrett T. 13,23,14,10,11,15,12,12,11,13,13,29,17,9,10,11,11,24,15,19,30,15,15,16,17,11,11,19,23,15,14,19,17,36,36,13,12,11,9,15,16,8,10,10,8,10,10,12,23,23,16,10,
NC Thomp 13,23,14,10,11,15,12,12,11,13,13,29,17,9,10,11,11,24,15,19,29,15,16,17,18,11,11,19,23,15,14,19,17,36,37,13,12,11,9,15,16,8,10,10,8,10,10,12,23,23,16,10,
36zhq Tho13,23,14,10,11,15,12,12,11,13,13,29,17,9,10,11,11,24,15,19,29,15,16,17,18,11,11,19,23,15,14,19,17,36,36,13,12.
William Tho13,23,14,10,11,15,12,12,11,13,13,29, 19,23, 12,11,9,15,16,8,10,10,8,10,10,
Chandler 13,22,14,10,11,15,12,12,11,13,13,29,17,9,10,11,11,24,15,19,30,15,16,17,18,11,11,19,23,16,14,19,17,36,37,12,12.
Daniel T 13,23,14,10,11,15,12,12,11,13,13,29,17,9,10,11,11,24,15,19,29,15,16,17,18,11,12,19,23,15, 12, 13
George T. 13,23,14,10,11,15,12,12,11,13,13,29,17,9,10,11,11,24,15,19,30,15,16,17,18,11,11,19,23.
John P Tho13,23,14,10,11,15,12,12,11,13,13,29,17,9,10,11,11,24,15,19,30,15,16,17, 11,11,19,23.
William Tho13,23,14,10,11,15,12,12,11,13,13,29,17,9, 9,11,11,24,15,19,29,15,16,17,18,11,11,19,23,15,14,20,17,36,37,13,12,
John Thom13,23,14,10,11,15,12,12,11,13,13,29,17,9,10,11,11,25,14,19,30,15,16,17,18,11,11,19,22,16,14,16,17,36,39,12,11,9,15,16,8,10,
Tom
Forum_mgr:
Great!
That is EXACTLY what this forum topic is for. Now - let's see some others post theirs.
Booner? You asked for this topic --- we're looking for your data now.
F.M.
uneven:
Wasn't sure if I should start a new thread of reply to this one. Here are my results converted for FTDNA/Ysearch with the original numbers after for clarity. Ancestry.com/Sorenson Genomics pulls different panels than FTDNA as well so some of my results are from FTDNA's 67 marker test, while others will be missing ::)
Here's me in text form. These are the values I have at Ysearch. My values from Ancestry.com are different so these are the converted values.
DYS 393 = 13
390 = 25
19/394 = 14
391 = 11
385a = 11
385b = 11
426 = 12
388 = 12
439 = 12
389I = 13
392 = 13
389II = 30
458 = 17
459a = 9
459b = 10455 = 11
454 = 11
447 = 24
437 = 15
448 = 19
449 = 29
464a = 15
464b = 15
464c = 17
464d = 17
460 = 11
GATA H4 = 10
YCAIIa = 19
YCAIIb = 22456 = 16
442 = 12
438 = 12
444 = 12
446 = 13
461 = 12
462 = 11
GATA A10 = 12
635 = 23
GAAT1B07 = 10
441 = 13
445 = 12
452 = 31
463 = 23
If anyone else was suckered into Ancestry.com, here's how my actual results from Ancestry.com (Sorenson Genomics) differ from the ysearch conversion:
DYS441 = 14
442 = 17
458 = 16.2
GATA-A10 = 14
Y-GATA-H4 = 11
Booner:
Last year, Ancestry.com had a special on DNA testing so I took advantage of it and had my DNA analyzed. Below are my results. I'm hoping that any others who have DNA results will post them here.
Again, my testing was done by Ancestry.com. Other testing companies use different standards to determine the marker values. The Sorenson Molecular Genealogy Foundation has a comparison chart for adjusting the various values between different companies at: www.smgf.org/ychromosomr/marker_standards.jspx
LOCATION: SEQUENCE LOCATION: SEQUENCE LOCATION: SEQUENCE
DYS 19a 14 DYS 444 12 DYS 464a 15
DYS 19b -- DYS 445 12 DYS 464b 16
DYS 385a 11 DYS 446 13 DYS 464c 17
DYS 385b 15 DYS 447 24 DYS 464d 18
DYS 388 12 DYS 448 19 DYS 464e --
DYS 389I 13 DYS 449 29 DYS 464f --
DYS 389II 29 DYS 452 30 GAAT1807 10
DYS 390 23 DYS 454 11 YCA IIa 19
DYS 391 10 DYS 455 11 YCA IIb 23
DYS 392 13 DYS 456 15 GATA A10 14
DYS 393 13 DYS 458 17 DYS 635 24
DYS 426 12 DYS 459a 9 GATA H4.I 22
DYS 437 15 DYS 459b 10
DYS 438 12 DYS 460 11
DYS 439 11 DYS 461 12
DYS 441 14 DYS 462 11
DYS 442 18 DYS 463 24
regards,
Booner
uneven:
Hi Booner, It looks like Sorenson moved that page for comparisons of different companys: http://www.smgf.org/ychromosome/marker_standards.jspx
I also noticed that the Sorenson page says Ancestry matches them..which is true if you tested in June with me but before that I think Ancestry was using DNA Heritage for testing so the rules for conversion are a bit different:
--- Quote ---Relative Genetics (RG), DNA Heritage and Ancestry
DYS 441: subtract 1 from the value received from the other lab and enter the result into Ysearch
DYS 442: subtract 5 from the value received from the other lab and enter the result into Ysearch
DYS 454 and DYS 455: Please add 1 to your values only if your values were reported prior to March 2003, i.e., if you had a score of 9 for DYS 454, make it 10. Same thing for DYS 455.
DYS 461: Please add 1 to your value only if your value was reported prior to May 7, 2004.
GATA-H4 is reported by Relative Genetics as TAGA-H4. Please subtract 1 from your value.
GATA-H4 reported by DNAH and Ancestry: subtract 11 from the value received from the other lab and enter the result into Ysearch
Y-GATA-A10: subtract 2 from the value received from the other lab and enter the result into Ysearch
--- End quote ---
I realized it when I saw that your GATA H4 value was 22...11 higher than mine even though we used the same company. Too bad the company we used uses different companies!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version